Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:53
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Poll: Is Xbox heading in the right direction? Cast your vote here! - Windows Central
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Do leftists understand why young men are becoming more right-wing?
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Kquorans, can you please write a story?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Would deporting illegal aliens alleviate the housing crisis?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Two space vets added to Astronaut Hall of Fame as one awaits launch - collectSPACE.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Judge rejects Newsom’s emergency request to limit Trump LA troop deployment - The Hill